Altri HDACi anti-latenza in fase clinica: panobinostat

Ricerca scientifica finalizzata all'eradicazione o al controllo dell'infezione.
Dora
Messaggi: 7493
Iscritto il: martedì 7 luglio 2009, 10:48

Re: Altri HDACi anti-latenza in fase clinica: panobinostat

Messaggio da Dora » giovedì 30 maggio 2013, 21:59

Dora ha scritto:Seguendo una suggestione di Richard Jefferys, ho riletto la review di Rasmussen e Søgaard che ho citato all’inizio di questo thread – Eliminating the latent HIV reservoir by reactivation strategies – in particolare un paragrafo che avevo trascurato quando ho scritto il mio primo post, in cui si discute di immunoterapia e di agonisti del Toll-Like Receptor.

È possibile che questi ricercatori danesi vedano la via dell’eradicazione come una terapia combinata, formata da panobinostat per risvegliare l’HIV latente e CPG 7909, un agonista del TLR9 che dovrebbe contribuire a risolvere il “problema di Siliciano e Shang”.

In effetti, la stimolazione dell’immunità innata non-specifica attraverso il sistema dei TLR è utilizzata per trattare certe infezioni virali ed è anche una via che il gruppo di ricercatori dell’università di Aarhus sta sperimentando per migliorare l’immunizzazione (cfr. trial e articolo).

Da studi in vitro, Rasmussen e colleghi hanno visto che si crea un effetto sinergico se si combinano insieme degli HDACi con uno stimolante sintetico delle funzioni immunitarie che sfrutta il meccanismo di riattivazione dell’HIV via TLR9: trattando una linea di cellule latentemente infette con concentrazioni crescenti di questo stimolante sintetico (chiamato CpG ODN - CpG oligodeossinucleotidi e specificamente CPG 7909) e con basse concentrazioni di panobinostat, si sono visti aumenti rilevanti di produzione di HIV.

Immagine
Un post su The Body ripreso dal Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange offre molti interessanti dettagli sul CPG 7909, da cui anche si comprende perché questo agonista del TLR9 non sia già entrato nel protocollo di sperimentazione dell'eradicazione via panobinostat (e tante grazie alla Pfizer).
  • As mentioned in our previous CATIE News story, Danish scientists have been studying potential ways of curing HIV infection with the experimental cancer drug panobinostat. Interim results of their clinical trial of this drug will be presented later this year at an international conference. In the meantime, Danish scientists have also been doing some other interesting cure research that may have gone underappreciated. This other research is the focus of this CATIE News story. Before getting into the details of their work, a bit of background is necessary.

    A Lesson From History

    In the late 1800s, New York surgeon William Coley began experiments to assess the impact of inducing bacterial infections on the course of certain cancers in people. Specifically, he deliberately caused serious skin infections with Streptococcus and later other bacteria. This idea was based on observation that some patients with cancer experienced unexpected remission of their disease when they also developed certain bacterial infections. However, the consequences of serious bacterial infections in the pre-antibiotic era could be dangerous. Eventually Dr. Coley and colleagues used injections of heat-killed bacteria (a mixture known as Coley's toxins). This resulted in limited success in carefully selected patients with certain cancers. Bear in mind that clinical trials in that era were not underpinned by rigorous statistics and they generally lacked a randomized, controlled design.

    Side Effects

    The initial effect of the therapy was to cause symptoms of a severe flu-like illness. Within an hour of injection of the vaccine, patients experienced severe but temporary chills, followed by a high fever. These and other symptoms cleared within 12 to 24 hours after injection. Some patients were given daily therapy with this vaccine, others received it every other day for weeks or months and then the administration was gradually reduced and ended, depending on the response of the cancer.
    Researchers in the late 20th century suspected that these bacterial vaccines worked by stimulating the body to produce a mix of chemical messengers, called cytokines, which alerted the immune system to the presence of cancer. Furthermore, these cytokines also strengthened the ability of cells of the immune system to destroy some cancers.

    Weakened Strains of Bacteria

    After Dr. Coley's death, general interest in his bacterial vaccines waned. Today, some scientists are aware of the potential of Dr. Coley's work. Bacterial extracts are now used as part of the treatment for some cases of bladder cancer. In this instance, doctors use weakened strains of bacteria related to those that cause TB (tuberculosis). The strain of bacteria used is called BCG. This works by stimulating the immune system resident in the bladder and helping it attack this cancer. BCG is also used to make a vaccine to prevent TB. However, this vaccine is not highly effective at preventing TB and is seldom used in high-income countries today.
    In the 1980s, Japanese researchers working with BCG found that exposing cells of the immune system to bacterial DNA improved their ability to attack cancerous tissue. In the 1990s, doctors in Japan conducted a clinical trial of bacterial DNA to treat patients with cancer. Their overall results were promising, with 43% of 75 patients demonstrating a response. However, due to the difficulty of creating uniform and safe concentrations of extracts of DNA derived from BCG, the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare rejected a request to license such therapy.

    Pattern Recognition

    In the mid-1990s, physician-investigator Arthur Krieg, M.D., and other scientists were trying to understand precisely how bacterial extracts, such as those used by Dr. Coley, could have such a profound impact on the immune system and cancer cells. In experiments in the lab, scientists exposed cells of the immune system to tiny pieces of nucleic acids (strips of DNA) arising from bacterial infections. This exposure to bacterial nucleic acids caused cells to produce a protective immune response. Further research found that a segment of the tiny pieces of nucleic acid were common to many bacteria and triggered a protective response by the immune system when it encountered different species of bacteria. This occurred because the immune system recognized a pattern in the nucleic acid of bacteria via specialized receptors. These receptors are called TLRs (toll-like receptors).

    Recognizing Viruses and Cancer

    TLRs act as part of the body's warning system for invasion by germs. Different TLRs serve to recognize different patterns in different types of germs. One type of TLR called TLR9 is particularly important. Researchers have found that TLR9 plays a role in helping the immune system sense viral infections such as HIV, HBV (hepatitis B virus) and HPV (human papilloma virus). All three viruses can cause varying degrees of immune dysfunction in people and have been associated with an increased risk for the development of different cancers. Furthermore, these particular viral infections weaken the ability of TLR9 to alert the immune system to the presence of viruses and tumours. Partly as a result of weakened TLR9 activity, and likely other immunologic dysfunction associated with these viral infections, the immune system is not able to contain and eradicate these viruses and the tumours they cause.

    CpG -- A Refined Approach

    As mentioned earlier, exposure to bacterial extracts such as Coley's toxins can cause unpleasant symptoms. A more refined approach to eliciting a protective immune response uses artificially created strings of DNA that mimic patterns found in bacterial and viral DNA. These artificial strings of nucleic acids are called CpG.
    Researchers in several countries have tested the general safety and preliminary effectiveness of CpG 7909 (also known as agatolimod, PF-3512676, ProMune). This compound interacts with TLR9 and appears to boost its function, activating the immune system to better sense and fight viral infections and possibly some tumours. Several clinical trials have been done with CpG 7909 in HIV-negative patients with cancer. Several small clinical trials and two large phase III clinical trials (enrolling a total of about 1,600 patients with advanced lung cancer receiving chemotherapy) have been performed with CpG 7909 in HIV-negative patients. In these trials the drug appeared to be generally safe; however, there appeared to be limited anti-cancer effect.

    CpG 7909 -- Tested in HIV-Positive Volunteers in Canada

    In the past decade, a team of scientists at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute tested CpG 7909 in HIV-positive people. In their experiments, the researchers used very small doses of this CpG together with a hepatitis B vaccine. The team found that this compound, when combined with the vaccine, increased the immune system's response to the vaccine and this response lasted a long time. The use of CpG 7909 was generally safe, with side effects (redness and swelling at the injection site) being temporary.

    The New Danish Study

    Several years ago, a team of researchers at Aarhus University in Denmark conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled study to compare the effect of a pneumonia vaccine with or without CpG 7909 in 97 HIV-positive people who were taking combination anti-HIV therapy (commonly called ART or HAART). In this study, repeated injections of 1 mg of CpG 7909 at the start and in the third and ninth months of the trial significantly increased the immune response to the vaccine.
    However, the Danish team did some additional research. After the study was completed they reanalyzed stored blood samples from a subset of participants. The purpose of this reanalysis was to assess the impact that exposure to CpG 7909 may have had on the proportion of HIV-infected cells in the blood. The reason for this investigation was that laboratory studies done several years before with cells and HIV found that several CpGs had the ability to both stimulate HIV replication from resting infected cells and to interfere with HIV's ability to cause new infections.
    The team found that the proportion of HIV-infected cells fell by 12% after each injection of CpG. This finding suggests that regular exposure to CpG 7909 can reduce the burden of HIV-infected cells in the body. This burden is called the "reservoir" by scientists and, in theory, a smaller reservoir should make curing HIV ultimately easier over the long term. However, separate clinical trials will be needed to assess this possibility, as none of the participants who received CpG injections were cured.
    In contrast, among participants who received placebo, the proportion of HIV-infected cells remained about the same. Furthermore, participants who received injections of CpG appeared to have killer T-cells (called CD8+ cells) with increased anti-HIV activity. There was no detectable increase in HIV antibodies in participants.
    According to the researchers, CpG 7909 was "generally well tolerated," with mild side effects at the injection site (pain, swelling, redness, bruising). In some cases there were also temporary flu-like symptoms (such as fever, joint pain, chills and fatigue) and in 76% of participants, these were judged to be of "moderate to severe" intensity. Exposure to CpG did not reduce CD4+ cell counts. In some cases, there were very small and temporary increases in HIV viral load. But no participant had their viral load become detectable (that is, rise above the 50 copies/ml mark) for more than two consecutive blood tests. Further analyses found that CpG 7909 did not cause any toxicity to major organ-systems such as the bone marrow, liver or kidneys.

    Caution Needed

    The results from the Danish reanalysis are modest yet promising. However, they need to be interpreted cautiously, at least for the following reasons:
    • - Reanalyzing data from a study designed for a different purpose can, at best, yield interesting results. However, such reanalysis cannot produce definitive results. The findings from the Danish study can be used to design a clinical trial to assess the impact of CpG 7909 on changes in the proportion of HIV-infected cells, perhaps with more participants and over a longer period.
      - The reanalysis had additional gaps: The study was not formally designed to assess the impact on the immune system's ability to detect and destroy HIV-infected cells. Therefore, the scientists are not certain how repeated exposure to CpG 7909 apparently reduced the burden of HIV-infected cells.

    What is clear is that no one has yet been cured of HIV by repeated exposure to CpG 7909 over a period of 10 months. Also, such a cure -- with this or any other therapy -- is not imminent. Rather, much more study is required of this exciting compound, perhaps in combination with other experimental drugs in HIV-positive people who are taking ART.


    Problems With Access to CpG 7909

    CpG 7909 was developed by the Coley Pharmaceutical Group, which was then acquired by the pharmaceutical company Pfizer in 2011, along with all of the rights for commercially testing and using CpG 7909 in people. Pfizer is developing a new CpG molecule that recently entered clinical trials, but they have not been providing this to outside groups for testing. CpG 7909 is in cancer vaccines being developed by GlaxoSmithKline as well as in several other cancer vaccines being developed by university-based scientists. Although clinical trials with CpG 7909 are ongoing in HIV-negative people, Pfizer has not continued Coley's policy of providing the compound to academic researchers for their research. Until this situation changes, it is not likely that CpG 7909 will be tested in clinical trials in HIV-positive people.

    Not Giving Up

    Although the Danish scientists cannot currently access CpGs for clinical trials in people, they are not giving up on cure research. They have at least another approach to a potential cure for HIV. In collaboration with other scientists in Australia, Sweden and the United States, they are testing a drug that will hopefully help to drive HIV out of hiding. This approach has the potential to reduce the burden of HIV-infected cells in the body and make future attempts at a cure perhaps easier. The drug being tested is an experimental cancer therapy called panobinostat, made by the pharmaceutical company Novartis. Panobinostat belongs to a class of drugs called HDAC inhibitors. Interim results from their study of panobinostat will be released later this year. To find out more about HDAC inhibitors and their potential and challenges for curing HIV, see TreatmentUpdate 196.

    Cure Research in Context

    The journey toward a cure will not be easy and many challenges lie ahead. Some of the challenges are known, others may only become known as experiments proceed. As with any great scientific endeavour, there will be setbacks. The initial wave of cure research experiments over the next five to 10 years should be viewed as exploratory and their results highly preliminary. This research will seek to answer important scientific questions that can then be used to build a foundation toward a cure. In the meantime, research funding agencies need to show patience and sustained funding as hardworking scientists struggle against the many challenges that lie in their path as they search for avenues to explore in the quest for an HIV cure.

    Acknowledgement

    We thank Ole Søgaard, M.D., and colleagues at Aarhus University, Denmark, and Arthur Krieg, M.D., RaNA Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, for their helpful comments, research assistance and expert review.

    References
    • 1- Coley RB. The treatment of malignant tumors by repeated inoculations of erysipelas. With a report of ten original cases. 1893. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1991 Jan;(262):3-11.
      2- Starnes CO. Coley's toxins in perspective. Nature. 1992 May 7;357(6373):11-2.
      3- Krieg AM, Yi AK, Matson S, et al. CpG motifs in bacterial DNA trigger direct B-cell activation. Nature. 1995 Apr 6;374(6522):546-9.
      4- Tokunaga T, Yamamoto T, Yamamoto S. How BCG led to the discovery of immunostimulatory DNA. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1999 Feb;52(1):1-11.
      5- Janeway CA Jr, Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annual Review of Immunology. 2002;20:197-216.
      6- Krieg AM. CpG motifs in bacterial DNA and their immune effects. Annual Review of Immunology. 2002;20:709-60.
      7- Takeda K, Kaisho T, Akira S. Toll-like receptors. Annual Review of Immunology. 2003;21:335-76.
      8- Krieg AM. CpG motifs: the active ingredient in bacterial extracts? Nature Medicine. 2003 Jul;9(7):831-5.
      9- Hirsch I, Caux C, Hasan U, et al. Impaired Toll-like receptor 7 and 9 signaling: from chronic viral infections to cancer. Trends in Immunology. 2010 Oct;31(10):391-7.
      10- Cooper CL, Davis HL, Angel JB, et al. CPG 7909 adjuvant improves hepatitis B virus vaccine seroprotection in antiretroviral-treated HIV-infected adults. AIDS. 2005 Sep 23;19(14):1473-9.
      11- Søgaard OS, Lohse N, Harboe ZB, et al. Improving the immunogenicity of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in HIV-infected adults with a toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant: a randomized, controlled trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2010 Jul 1;51(1):42-50.
      12- Winckelmann AA, Munk-Petersen LV, Rasmussen TA, et al. Administration of a Toll-Like Receptor 9 agonist decreases the proviral reservoir in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 26;8(4):e62074.
      13 Shan L, Siliciano RF. From reactivation of latent HIV-1 to elimination of the latent reservoir: the presence of multiple barriers to viral eradication. Bioessays. 2013 Apr 24.
      14- Aarhus University Hospital. Correction to HIV story. Press release. 3 May 2013.
      15- Aarhus University Hospital. Danish scientists get one step closer to a cure. Press release. 1 May 2013.
      16- Krieg AM. CpG still rocks! Update on an accidental drug. Nucleic Acid Therapeutics. 2012 Apr;22(2):77-89.
      17- Rasmussen TA, Tolstrup M, Winckelmann A, et al. Eliminating the latent HIV reservoir by reactivation strategies: Advancing to clinical trials. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2013 Apr 1;9(4).
      18- Archin NM, Liberty AL, Kashuba AD, et al. Administration of vorinostat disrupts HIV-1 latency in patients on antiretroviral therapy. Nature. 2012 Jul 25;487(7408):482-5.
      19- Deeks SG. HIV: Shock and kill. Nature. 2012 Jul 25;487(7408):439-40.
      20- Cillo A, Sobolewski M, Coffin J, et al. Only a small fraction of HIV-1 proviruses in resting CD4+ T cells can be induced to produce virions ex vivo with anti-CD3/CD28 or vorinostat. In: Program and abstracts of the 20th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, 3-6 March 2013, Atlanta, U.S. Abstract 371.
      21- Kent SJ, Reece JC, Petravic J, et al. The search for an HIV cure: tackling latent infection. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2013; in press.
      22- Katlama C, Deeks SG, Autran B, et al. Barriers to a cure for HIV: new ways to target and eradicate HIV-1 reservoirs. Lancet. 2013; in press.
      23- Yukl SA, Boritz E, Busch M, et al. Challenges in detecting HIV persistence during potentially curative interventions: A study of the Berlin patient. PloS Pathogens. 2013 May;9(5):e1003347.
      24- Buitendijk M, Eszterhas SK, Howell AL. A Toll-Like Receptor-7 agonist that inhibits HIV type 1 infection of human macrophages and activated T cells. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. 2013 Jun;29(6):907-18



Boyz84
Messaggi: 70
Iscritto il: giovedì 28 marzo 2013, 14:00

Re: Altri HDACi anti-latenza in fase clinica: panobinostat

Messaggio da Boyz84 » venerdì 31 maggio 2013, 0:03

Dora ci semplifichi il tutto non appena hai tempo???
i love you :roll:



Dora
Messaggi: 7493
Iscritto il: martedì 7 luglio 2009, 10:48

Re: Altri HDACi anti-latenza in fase clinica: panobinostat

Messaggio da Dora » venerdì 31 maggio 2013, 7:43

Boyz84 ha scritto:Dora ci semplifichi il tutto non appena hai tempo???
i love you :roll:
Come dirti di no, davanti a una dichiarazione d’amore?! :D

Per fartela breve, questo filone di ricerca ha una lunga e travagliata storia, perché risale a più di un secolo fa, quando un chirurgo americano – William Coley – cercò di sfruttare l’infezione causata da diversi tipi di batteri inattivati mediante calore per curare il cancro di alcuni suoi pazienti. Era una strada pericolosa, perché gli antibiotici erano ancora di là da venire, ma poté constatare che la somministrazione di questa specie di vaccino in certi casi portava a un miglioramento del cancro.

Un secolo dopo, si fece in luce l’ipotesi che questi vaccini batterici stimolassero il corpo a produrre delle citochine, che a loro volta stimolavano il sistema immunitario a combattere il cancro. Si fecero degli esperimenti esponendo cellule immunitarie ad acidi nucleici ricavati dalle infezioni batteriche e le cellule produssero una risposta immune protettiva quando le si misero a contatto con dei batteri: il sistema immunitario aveva riconosciuto un determinato modello nel materiale genetico dei batteri grazie a dei recettori, che vennero chiamati toll-like receptors (TLR). Questi agiscono come parte del sistema che avverte il corpo che è in atto un’invasione da parte di germi e TLR diversi riconoscono modelli diversi in tipi di patogeni diversi.

Il TLR9 aiuta il sistema immunitario ad accorgersi dei virus: HIV, HBV e HPV in particolare, che sono tre virus che causano disfunzione immunitaria, sono associati a un aumentato rischio di sviluppare tumori e indeboliscono la capacità del TLR9 di avvertire il sistema immunitario della loro presenza. Proprio questo malfunzionamento del TLR9 è una delle ragioni per cui il sistema immunitario non riesce a contenere ed eradicare queste tre infezioni.

Oggi, per stimolare risposte immuni protettive si usano delle stringhe di DNA che riproducono i modelli trovati nel DNA di batteri e di virus e sono chiamate CpG.
Il CpG7909 è già stato testato per sicurezza ed efficacia e sembra che sia capace di migliorare il funzionamento del TLR9. Sono già stati fatti dei trial clinici, alcuni piccoli, ma un paio grandi e già di fase III su pazienti con cancro ai polmoni e in chemioterapia e si è visto che il farmaco è ben tollerato, ma il suo effetto anti-cancro è debole.

Nell’ultimo decennio, però, è stato anche sperimentato in Canada su persone con HIV e si è visto che un basso dosaggio di CpG7909 somministrato insieme al vaccino contro l’HBV aumentava la risposta al vaccino e la faceva durare più a lungo.

I nostri danesi della Aahrus University hanno fatto anni fa un trial randomizzato controllato con placebo per vedere se il CpG7909 rinforzava l’effetto di un vaccino contro la polmonite in persone con HIV che prendevano la ART. E hanno visto che sì, la risposta immune era migliorata e gli effetti collaterali erano stati tutto sommato trascurabili (sintomi simil-influenzali; soprattutto nessun danno a midollo, reni o fegato).

Alla fine dello studio, hanno analizzato di nuovo i campioni di sangue di una parte dei pazienti perché volevano stabilire l’impatto che il CpG7909 aveva avuto sulle cellule infette dall’HIV, in particolare volevano capire se era stata stimolata la replicazione del virus nelle cellule latentemente infette e si erano verificate nuove infezioni (un effetto constatato con diversi CpG). Ma quel che hanno scoperto è che la proporzione di cellule infette da HIV è diminuita del 12% dopo ogni somministrazione del CpG7909, mentre in chi aveva ricevuto il placebo la proporzione è rimasta costante. Così ne hanno tratto l’ipotesi che un’esposizione regolare a questa sostanza possa ridurre il reservoir virale.
Si è anche visto che i CD8 di chi aveva ricevuto questo agonista del TLR9 erano più cattivi contro l’HIV, mentre non c’è stato un aumento degli anticorpi anti-HIV.

Servono però dei trial clinici separati, anzitutto perché nessuno dei partecipanti a quel trial è risultato curato; e in secondo luogo perché rianalizzare dei dati vecchi non può ovviamente dare risultati conclusivi.

Qual è il problema? È che la Pfizer, che dal 2011 possiede i diritti per testare il CpG7909 sugli esseri umani, non dà questa sostanza a ricercatori accademici indipendenti. Quindi, finché non cambia idea, i danesi non possono partire con un trial tutto loro.



Dora
Messaggi: 7493
Iscritto il: martedì 7 luglio 2009, 10:48

Re: Altri HDACi anti-latenza in fase clinica: panobinostat

Messaggio da Dora » martedì 2 luglio 2013, 16:20

Comunicato ufficiale dell'Ahrhus University Hospital sui risultati preliminari della sperimentazione con panobinostat portati a IAS 2013:

Hidden HIV virus can be forced out of hiding

Danish researchers have taken a small step towards a cure against HIV.

Preliminary results from a clinical study by HIV researchers from Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark confirm the hypothesis that a new drug can reactivate latent HIV in humans. The results were presented today to other international researchers at the 'HIV Cure Symposium' in Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia.

When HIV penetrates the body, it integrates into the DNA of certain immune cells and enters a resting state. In this resting state, cells carrying HIV in their genome are unrecognisable to the immune system. Antiretroviral medicine effectively suppresses virus production and thus, HIV disease progression, but currently there is no treatment that can remove the latent HIV hidden in these cells.

A group of researchers from Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University has used a drug called panobinostat (LBH589) - a so-called HDAC inhibitor - which was previously shown to activate hidden HIV virus in laboratory tests. In theory this means that it will be easier for the immune system to trace and fight the cells hiding the virus.

Now researchers have taken a further step. During treatment of 15 Danish HIV-infected patients with panobinostat (LBH589), an increase in HIV in the blood has been measured. This means that the researchers have successfully forced the immune cells carrying HIV out of their resting state, which is a prerequisite for allowing the immune system to identify and eliminate these cells. None of the patients have experienced serious side effects. Yet, the researchers urge to interpret the results with caution.

- It has never previously been seen that HDAC inhibitors can force hidden virus out of otherwise inactive immune cells to an extent where this can be measured in the blood in persons infected with HIV. Therefore, these are groundbreaking results. However, it is important to stress that we are not close to a cure against HIV, but we have taken a small step further towards a cure. The next challenge is whether the patients' immune system can identify the cells with virus and kill them, says Head of Research Martin Tolstrup, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital.


Facts
  • • The study is made in collaboration with specialists in Melbourne, Boston, Sydney and Colorado; the study is conducted at Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark.
    • Globally, 33 million people are infected with HIV.
    • The first significant results involving 15 HIV patients at Aarhus University Hospital show that HIV virus can be activated by panobinostat (LBH589), a so-called HDAC inhibitor, originally developed for cancer treatment.
    • The Danish Council for Strategic Research – the Individuals. Disease and Society programme – has supported the project with DKK 12 million. The American organisation amfAR – the Foundation for AIDS Research – and the Danish AIDS Fondet have also supported the study.



uffa2
Amministratore
Messaggi: 6764
Iscritto il: lunedì 26 novembre 2007, 0:07

Re: Altri HDACi anti-latenza in fase clinica: panobinostat

Messaggio da uffa2 » martedì 2 luglio 2013, 16:27

"we are not close to a cure against HIV, but we have taken a small step further towards a cure", già solo questo esercizio di understatement me li rende simpatici ;)


HIVforum ha bisogno anche di te!
se vuoi offrire le tue conoscenze tecniche o linguistiche (c'è tanto da tradurre) o sostenere i costi per mantenere e sviluppare HIVforum, contatta con un PM stealthy e uffa2, oppure scrivi a staff@hivforum.info

Dora
Messaggi: 7493
Iscritto il: martedì 7 luglio 2009, 10:48

Re: Altri HDACi anti-latenza in fase clinica: panobinostat

Messaggio da Dora » martedì 2 luglio 2013, 17:39

uffa2 ha scritto:"we are not close to a cure against HIV, but we have taken a small step further towards a cure", già solo questo esercizio di understatement me li rende simpatici ;)
Forse, dopo la fesseria della primavera scorsa, hanno capito che è saggio stare schisci.
A me, invece, è piaciuta questa frasetta qui:
  • During treatment of 15 Danish HIV-infected patients with panobinostat (LBH589), an increase in HIV in the blood has been measured.
Perché con il SAHA non è successo né a Margolis, né alla Lewin di misurare nel sangue del virus cacciato fuori da cellule quiescenti.
Spero di riuscire a vedere abstract e slides, ma per ora dobbiamo accontentarci del comunicato stampa.



uffa2
Amministratore
Messaggi: 6764
Iscritto il: lunedì 26 novembre 2007, 0:07

Re: Altri HDACi anti-latenza in fase clinica: panobinostat

Messaggio da uffa2 » martedì 2 luglio 2013, 17:55

Dora ha scritto:A me, invece, è piaciuta questa frasetta qui:
  • During treatment of 15 Danish HIV-infected patients with panobinostat (LBH589), an increase in HIV in the blood has been measured.
Perché con il SAHA non è successo né a Margolis, né alla Lewin di misurare nel sangue del virus cacciato fuori da cellule quiescenti.
...mi vedo già i cloni virali che escono dai CD4, pensando “siamo liberi”... e incontrano gli antiretrovirali che gli impediscono di fare qualunque cosa :-D


HIVforum ha bisogno anche di te!
se vuoi offrire le tue conoscenze tecniche o linguistiche (c'è tanto da tradurre) o sostenere i costi per mantenere e sviluppare HIVforum, contatta con un PM stealthy e uffa2, oppure scrivi a staff@hivforum.info

Dora
Messaggi: 7493
Iscritto il: martedì 7 luglio 2009, 10:48

Re: Altri HDACi anti-latenza in fase clinica: panobinostat

Messaggio da Dora » mercoledì 3 luglio 2013, 8:33

L'abstract (Tolstrup M. Cyclic panobinostat (LBH589) in HIV-1 patients: findings from the CLEAR trial) non è ancora disponibile, ma Gus Cairns ha appena postato per NAM una sintesi della presentazione, che ci dice qualcosa di più rispetto al comunicato stampa dell'ospedale Aahrus:
  • An HDAC inhibitor called vorinostat had already been shown to induce a 4.8-fold increase in HIV gene expression in reservoir cells after one dose, Professor Tolstrup said. However so far no production of the viral proteins which would stimulate an immune reaction to HIV had been seen.

    Panobinostat reaches levels ten times higher in the cells than vorinostat and the team gave 15 men with HIV twelve doses of it over eight weeks, three doses a week on a week-on-week-off basis. The men were all in late middle age but varied in their medical history: they had been diagnosed for between 6.5 and 28 years, and had spent between 2.5 and 16 years on ART. One man had started ART immediately on diagnosis while one had not started till 18 years after testing HIV positive.

    The researchers used a test for HIV RNA (gene products) to detect low levels of HIV or HIV proteins in the blood. This is the same technology used in viral load testing but this was sensitive to as little as one copy per millilitre of HIV RNA. They found that after the first dose 60% of patients expressed low but detectable levels of HIV RNA in their blood compared with only 28% before panobinostat, and that only one of the 15 patients showed no detectable HIV RNA throughout the study period.

    The team will publish data on HIV RNA and DNA detected within cells soon, and will test groups of reservoir cells to find out how many remain with hidden HIV infections and how many can produce replication-competent HIV. The hope is that if the panobinostat can drain the reservoir sufficiently, it might be safe to take patients off ART for a monitored treatment interruption.



Dora
Messaggi: 7493
Iscritto il: martedì 7 luglio 2009, 10:48

Re: Altri HDACi anti-latenza in fase clinica: panobinostat

Messaggio da Dora » mercoledì 3 luglio 2013, 17:30

Su cortesia di J.Levin e da me un poco sistemate, le slides della presentazione di Martin Tolstrup a IAS 2013 (poiché sono una descrizione di quanto è già stato scritto nei post precedenti e una sintesi della sperimentazione che abbiamo discusso all'inizio del thread, le posto tutte ma non sto a raccontarle in italiano).


Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine

Immagine



Dora
Messaggi: 7493
Iscritto il: martedì 7 luglio 2009, 10:48

Re: Altri HDACi anti-latenza in fase clinica: panobinostat

Messaggio da Dora » domenica 8 dicembre 2013, 22:39

L'abstract portato al workshop su reservoir etc. di Miami da Rasmussen e gli altri danesi (più Sharon Lewin e tanti altri) ci dà importanti indicazioni su come è andato il trial sul panobinostat, perché tutti e 15 i pazienti previsti hanno completato sia le 8 settimane di cicli di farmaco antilatenza, sia il follow up.
I dati preliminari di 13 su 15 pazienti hanno mostrato aumenti significativi nella trascrizione dell'HIV misurata dai livelli di HIV RNA disgiunto (unspliced HIV RNA) nei CD4. Inoltre, l'HIV RNA è stato rilevabile nel plasma con più frequenza durante la somministrazione di panobinostat rispetto ai valori di partenza.
QUESTO È SENZA DUBBIO PIÙ INCORAGGIANTE DI QUEL CHE AVVENNE CON IL VORINOSTAT.
16 dei 43 eventi avversi riferiti dai pazienti sono presumibilmente da imputarsi al panobinostat: si sono verificati in 10 pazienti, sono stati tutti molto modesti (di grado 1) e il più comune è stato la fatigue.
La conclusione tratta dai ricercatori è che questo HDACi funziona nell'invertire la latenza dell'HIV, portando ad aumenti dell'RNA virale nel plasma.

MA DELL'HIV DNA NON CI VIENE ANCORA DETTO NULLA DI CHIARO.



Cyclic Dosing of Panobinostat to Reverse HIV-latency: Findings from a Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Reactivating transcription of proviral HIV is currently investigated as a therapeutic strategy to eliminate latently infected cells and deplete the latent HIV-1 reservoir. We aimed to evaluate the ability of the highly potent histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) panobinostat to reverse HIV latency.

METHODS: In a phase I/II clinical trial, HIV-infected adults on suppressive combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) received treatment with oral panobinostat 20 mg 3 times per week every other week over the course of 8 weeks while maintaining background cART. Patients were seen 13 times during the 8 weeks treatment period and at 4 and 24 weeks after completing panobinostat treatment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in cell-associated unspliced HIV RNA in CD4+ T cells. Secondary endpoints included safety, change in proviral total and integrated HIV-DNA, change in plasma HIV-RNA and change in the frequency of cells carrying replication competent virus. Histone H3 acetylation was measured on all study visits using flow cytometry.

RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included in the clinical trial. All patients completed full panobinostat dosing and follow up. Preliminary data in 13 of 15 patients revealed significant increases in HIV transcription as measured by levels of unspliced HIV-RNA in CD4+ T cells. Of 43 reported adverse events (AEs), 16 were presumed related to panobinostat; these occurred in 10 patients and were all grade 1 AEs. Fatigue was by far the most frequently reported AE presumed related to panobinostat. CD4+ T cell counts were unaffected by panobinostat treatment. Histone H3 acetylation levels increased significantly during periods of panobinostat administration, but returned to baseline levels at the post treatment follow up time points. Finally, detectable HIV-RNA in plasma was observed more frequently during panobinostat administration as compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION: Eight weeks of cyclic therapy with panobinostat was safe and well tolerated in HIV-infected adults on cART. Increases in cell-associated unspliced HIV RNA as well as increased detection of plasma HIV RNA were associated with panobinostat treatment indicating that this HDACi reverses HIV latency leading to increases in plasma HIV RNA.



Rispondi